This text was featured within the One Story to Learn Right this moment e-newsletter. Join it right here.
You’d have to return to the height years of Bob Dylan’s cultural relevance, when one critic cum stalker began looking out the songwriter’s rubbish for clues about his lyrics, to discover a musician who attracts as many novice code breakers as Taylor Swift does. Swift has fed the frenzy by declaring that her songs, her liner notes, her social-media posts—mainly every part round her—may need hidden meanings embedded in them. As she instructed The Washington Submit in 2022, she and her followers have “descended into shade coding, numerology, phrase searches, elaborate hints, and Easter eggs.”
That scavenger-hunt mentality can lead would-be decoders in instructions the singer won’t want, as with the “Gaylors” who seek for indicators that Swift is secretly queer. Now a distinct subculture is getting in on the act: A piece of the GOP has been conjuring alleged proof that Swift is a deep-state psy-op, and that perhaps—we’re simply asking questions right here—the NFL is in on it.
This principle bought its first burst of mainstream consideration final month, when Fox’s Jesse Watters aired a video that, he claimed, exhibits that “the Pentagon psychological-operations unit floated turning Taylor Swift into an asset.” The particular person talking within the video was not the truth is from the Pentagon, she was citing Swift as a generic instance of celeb affect, and this all occurred years after Swift grew to become tremendous well-liked anyway, however Watters nonetheless appeared to suppose it’d clarify “why or how she blew up like this.” He then interviewed a former FBI agent, who stated that Joe Biden’s presidential marketing campaign would really like Swift’s help (which is true) and that she might transfer substantial numbers of votes into Biden’s column (which isn’t the observe report that pop-music endorsements have traditionally had in American politics).
The psy-op rumor mutated into its most notorious type a number of weeks later. Vivek Ramaswamy, till not too long ago a presidential candidate himself, posted on X, “I’m wondering who’s going to win the Tremendous Bowl subsequent month. And I’m wondering if there’s a significant presidential endorsement coming from an artificially culturally propped-up couple this fall. Just a few wild hypothesis over right here, let’s see the way it ages over the following 8 months.”
Sure, that was a reference to Swift and her boyfriend, Travis Kelce of the Kansas Metropolis Chiefs. I’ve heard many ruminations over time about each rigged elections and rigged Tremendous Bowls, however this is likely to be the primary time I’ve seen somebody suggest that plotters would possibly rig an election by rigging the Tremendous Bowl.
Aside from that new wrinkle, although, none of that is unprecedented. Actually, as bizarre because the psy-op story might sound, it’s only a few quick hops away from a reasonably well-liked mind-set about tradition. To listen to some folks inform it, just about all pop is an op.
Conspiracy theories in regards to the music trade are available many flavors. A century in the past, to offer one of many uglier examples, Henry Ford’s Dearborn Impartial claimed {that a} “Jewish mix” was suppressing gentile music and selling jazz. “Standard music is a Jewish monopoly,” the paper declared in 1921. “Jazz is a Jewish creation. The mush, the slush, the sly suggestion, the deserted sensuousness of sliding notes, are of Jewish origin.”
You didn’t should be a Ford-style bigot to suspect {that a} cabal was behind the music you disliked. In 1958, Vance Packard—the writer of The Hidden Persuaders, a best-selling assault on the promoting trade—testified to the U.S. Senate that “the general public was manipulated into liking rock and roll” and that “the rock and roll, hillbilly, and Latin American actions had been largely engineered, manipulated for the pursuits of the [music-licensing group] BMI.” When a Michigan senator objected that a lot of his constituents genuinely like hillbilly music, Packard agreeably replied, “I like a few of it too, however I feel the standard of it currently has been degenerating.”
The psychedelic ’60s gave us such pamphlets as David A. Noebel’s Communism, Hypnotism, and the Beatles (which claimed that the Kremlin was utilizing the Fab 4 to induce “synthetic neurosis” within the American baby) and Gary Allen’s That Music: There’s Extra to It Than Meets the Ear (which speculated that the Beatles’ music was “put collectively by behavioral scientists in some ‘suppose tank’”). Then got here the backmasking panic that peaked within the ’80s, when a horde of ministers, lecturers, broadcasters, and legislators grew to become satisfied that conspirators had been inserting backwards satanic messages into rock information, the place they’d subliminally lead younger listeners to Lucifer.
However the most well-liked satan principle of music is likely to be the suspicion that the trade itself is one large, sprawling maze of conspiracy, a suspicion that owes a lot of its reputation to the very fact that there’s a lot of reality to it. The music world is certainly crammed with secret plots, although they are typically extra petty than grand: Folks have conspired over time to bribe DJs, rip off artists’ royalties, juke the stats at streaming companies, and in any other case have interaction within the sometimes-sordid enterprise of producing hits and scooping up all they will of the earnings. And God is aware of the trade’s PR machines could be fountains of lies. So, sure: Music entrepreneurs function behind the scenes to create a picture and promote it, and generally they minimize some moral corners within the course of.
These information have fed a extra doubtful instinct, one which imagines the general public as a passive receptacle for the tradition trade’s output, robotically consuming no matter merchandise are pressed onto us. When Packard spoke with these senators, a lot of his testimony concerned believable claims about backroom enterprise practices. However he additionally declared that the trade might, if it needed, “make us all begin buzzing chants of zinc miners or marching tunes from the Struggle of 1812.” On this imaginative and prescient, the entrepreneurs are usually not merely slippery however omnipotent. It’s ops all the way in which down.
If you consider that entrepreneurs have unlocked the key to inducing demand for undesirable items, it’s not tough to increase the story’s solid of characters to incorporate the national-security state, the White Home, or every other villain you please. Certainly, covert forces generally do attempt to insert themselves into well-liked tradition, as when the Pentagon gives moviemakers entry to its personnel and materials in alternate for script approval. When folks study these actual propaganda pushes, it expands the vary of hidden operations they’re keen to think about.
However these puppet-master storylines vastly overstate the viewers’s malleability. Viva Brother, the Cats film—there are numerous examples of relentlessly hyped musical merchandise that did not promote, the New Cokes of the sonic world. And it’s not believable that the trade can be any higher at promoting nonmusical merchandise, similar to presidential candidates.
Not even probably the most superior Pentagon program can reliably information what cultural merchandise we’ll purchase or what messages we’ll take away from them. If Taylor Swift actually had been an op, I doubt she’d be a really efficient one. It’s true that when she shared a hyperlink to Vote.org on Nationwide Voter Registration Day final yr, the web site noticed a spike in registrations, although the scale of that spike is usually exaggerated. (No, she didn’t single-handedly trigger greater than 35,000 folks to register.) However there’s a distinction between getting folks to fill out a brief type on-line and getting them to the polls, not to mention getting them to vote your manner.
A extra practical take a look at Swift’s probably affect got here late final month, when a Newsweek survey discovered that 18 p.c of voters say they’re extra more likely to vote for a candidate endorsed by Swift—and 17 p.c are much less more likely to vote for somebody she endorses. That one-point hole was nicely inside the margin of error, so that you shouldn’t rely on it to tip Georgia into Biden’s fingers. I don’t wish to inform the Illuminati methods to do their job, however absolutely there are higher causes to rig the Tremendous Bowl than that.
great article
Excellent write-up
great article