Skip to main content





That’s the reply Caswell-Jin et al. (2024) purpose to reply. The authors used 4 most cancers mortality fashions inside CISNET for this examine:

  • Mannequin D (Dana-Farber Most cancers Institute). Used to outline a set of illness states and carried out analytic formulations to estimate the affiliation of interventions on transitions between these states, in addition to on breast most cancers incidence and mortality.
  • Mannequin M (MD Anderson Most cancers Middle). Relied on a a bayesian strategy, which asseded the chance distributions for unknown parameters, together with remedy advantages, and becoming to noticed breast most cancers mortality
  • mannequin S (Stanford College). A microsimulation that modelled pure historical past of illness primarily based on tumor measurement and stage development mapped to detection; therapies advantages have been utilized to baseline survival curves primarily based on stage, age, and estrogen receptor (ER)/ERBB2 (previously HER2) standing at detection.
  • mannequin W (College of Wisconsin–Harvard). This mannequin used a tumor development framework and was calibrated incidence and mortality primarily based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Finish Outcomes Program (SEER) registry. This mannequin additionally integrated a remedy fraction.

Classes of breast most cancers by ER/ERBB2 standing (ER+/ERBB2−, ER+/ERBB2+, ER/ERBB2+, and ER/ERBB2−) have been modelled individually.

Utilizing this strategy, the authors discovered that:

The breast most cancers mortality price within the US (age adjusted) was 48/100 000 ladies in 1975 and 27/100 000 ladies in 2019. In 2019, the mixture of screening, stage I to III remedy, and metastatic remedy was related to a 58% discount (mannequin vary, 55%-61%) in breast most cancers mortality. Of this discount, 29% (mannequin vary, 19%-33%) was related to remedy of metastatic breast most cancers, 47% (mannequin vary, 35%-60%) with remedy of stage I to III breast most cancers, and 25% (mannequin vary, 21%-33%) with mammography screening. Based mostly on simulations, the best change in survival after metastatic recurrence occurred between 2000 and 2019, from 1.9 years (mannequin vary, 1.0-2.7 years) to 3.2 years (mannequin vary, 2.0-4.9 years).

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2813878

You’ll be able to learn the total paper right here.




Supply hyperlink

Hector Antonio Guzman German

Graduado de Doctor en medicina en la universidad Autónoma de Santo Domingo en el año 2004. Luego emigró a la República Federal de Alemania, dónde se ha formado en medicina interna, cardiologia, Emergenciologia, medicina de buceo y cuidados intensivos.

Leave a Reply