Elise Stefanik and I had been talking for less than a couple of minute when she provided this stark self-assessment: “I’ve been an distinctive member of Congress.”
Her confidence jogged my memory of the various conceited pronouncements of Donald Trump (“I’d give myself an A+”), and that’s in all probability not an accident. Stefanik has been all over the place recently, amassing followers amongst Trump’s base at an important second—each for the GOP and for her future.
Stefanik spent October presiding over the leaderless Home GOP’s seek for a brand new speaker—a submit that Stefanik, the chair of the convention, conspicuously declined to hunt for herself. In a congressional listening to final month, she pressed three of America’s most distinguished college presidents to say whether or not they’d permit college students to name for Jewish genocide; instantly or not directly, her interrogation introduced down two of them. And for the previous a number of weeks, Stefanik has been making an enthusiastic case for Donald Trump’s return to the White Home.
She campaigned with him in New Hampshire final weekend, defending his psychological acuity within the face of apparent gaffes (“President Trump has not misplaced a step,” she insisted) and rejecting a jury’s conclusion that he sexually abused E. Jean Carroll. She parrots his baseless claims that the 2020 election was “rigged” and that the defendants charged with storming the Capitol to maintain him in workplace are “hostages.” After a GOP congressional candidate was caught on tape mildly criticizing Trump, Stefanik publicly withdrew her endorsement. Barely an hour after the networks declared Trump the winner of the Iowa caucus—earlier than Iowans had even completed voting—she issued an announcement calling on his remaining opponents to drop out of the race.
I spoke with Stefanik about her fierce protection of Trump, which has gained her reward from the previous president. In New Hampshire, he known as her “good” and lauded her questioning of the college presidents as “surgical.” (He did, nevertheless, butcher her identify.) Nearly everybody can see that Stefanik has been mounting an elaborate audition. The 39-year-old clearly didn’t go up a bid for Home speaker as a result of she lacks ambition. Quite the opposite, she appears to have a much bigger promotion in thoughts: not second in line to the presidency, however first. In our dialog, Stefanik didn’t make a lot effort to dispel the notion that she needs to be Trump’s working mate. “I’d be honored to serve in any capability within the Trump administration,” she instructed me, repeating a line she’s used earlier than.
Her shows of fealty apart, Stefanik has rather a lot going for her. She has grow to be, with out query, essentially the most highly effective Republican in New York, the place her prodigious fundraising helped give the GOP a majority. Stefanik’s Home GOP colleagues say she is extraordinarily good, and he or she nonetheless attracts compliments for her behind-the-scenes function throughout final fall’s speakership disaster, when she ran a tense and seemingly countless collection of closed-door convention conferences. Whether or not or not her declining to run for speaker was tied to the vice presidency, it was politically shrewd. “It didn’t work out nicely for many others,” joked Consultant Patrick McHenry of North Carolina, who briefly served as performing speaker and equally turned down an opportunity to win the job completely. “She noticed the writing on the wall,” a fellow New York Republican, Consultant Andrew Garbarino, instructed me. “She was good sufficient to say, ‘I’m not popping my head up solely to get it chopped off.’”
The fervor that Stefanik brings to her Trump protection has made her a favourite for VP amongst a few of his staunchest allies, together with Steve Bannon, who stays a power in MAGA world. “She’s a present horse and a workhorse, and that in and of itself is fairly extraordinary in trendy American politics,” Bannon instructed me. “She’s at, if not the highest, very near the highest of the listing.”
Stefanik will not be delicate, however she’s made herself related in a celebration nonetheless dedicated to Trump. Her future success now depends upon his—and whether or not he rewards her loyalty with the prize she so clearly needs.
Stefanik routinely boasts that she was the primary member of Congress to endorse Trump’s reelection. That’s true so far as 2024 goes, nevertheless it neatly obscures the truth that she didn’t again his major marketing campaign in 2016. Nor did she present a lot assist for Trump’s motion because it took root within the GOP.
After graduating from Harvard, Stefanik started her political profession within the George W. Bush White Home and later served as an aide to Paul Ryan throughout his vice-presidential run. In 2014, at age 30, she was elected to the Home—the youngest girl ever elected to Congress on the time—and carved out a fame as a reasonable in each coverage and tone. She made an abrupt flip towards Trumpism through the former president’s first impeachment hearings, in 2019, and eagerly backed his reelection the next 12 months. In 2021, she changed the ousted Trump critic Consultant Liz Cheney as convention chair, making her the fourth-ranking Republican within the Home.
Not one for public introspection, Stefanik has by no means absolutely defined her transformation right into a Trump devotee past saying she was impressed by his insurance policies as president. The only reply is that she adopted the need of her upstate–New York constituents, who got here to embrace Trump after favoring Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012. “I replicate, I’d say, the voters in my district,” she instructed me shortly earlier than the 2020 election.
To say that Stefanik shows the zeal of a convert doesn’t do justice to the phrase. She has grow to be certainly one of Trump’s foremost defenders and enforcers in Congress. At first “it was stunning,” former Consultant Adam Kinzinger, a Republican colleague of Stefanik’s for eight years, instructed me of her Trump pivot. “Now it’s simply gross.”
Kinzinger and Stefanik had each served as leaders of a bunch of reasonable Home Republicans, however they took reverse paths through the Trump years. Kinzinger voted to question Trump after January 6 and left Congress two years later. “In her core, she’s a deep opportunist and has put her private ambition over what she is aware of is nice for the nation,” Kinzinger mentioned. Though Stefanik has been in Trump’s nook for greater than 4 years now, Kinzinger mentioned she “has ramped up her sycophancy” because the possibilities of Trump’s renomination—and the potential of her serving on the nationwide ticket—have come extra absolutely into view.
Shut allies of Stefanik naturally dispute this characterization; they instructed me that though they suppose she’d make a wonderful vice chairman, she has not as soon as introduced up the subject with them. “He’s going to have nice choices, however Elise shall be on the prime of that listing,” Majority Chief Steve Scalise instructed me. After I requested Stefanik whether or not she was campaigning to be on Trump’s ticket, she replied: “I’m centered on doing my job.”
Different contenders incessantly talked about as potential Trump working mates embrace South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem; Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders, who served as certainly one of Trump’s White Home press secretaries; Senator Tim Scott of South Carolina; and the businessman Vivek Ramaswamy.
One senior Republican who’s pleasant with each Stefanik and Trump lauded her management expertise and political acumen however doubted that Trump would choose her. “She doesn’t have govt expertise,” the Republican instructed me, talking on the situation of anonymity to speak candidly about Stefanik’s possibilities. A Trump-campaign spokesperson didn’t return a request for remark.
Whilst they reward her, Stefanik allies often describe her in ways in which counsel she lacks authenticity. “She’s a very smart, calculated particular person,” Chris Tague, a Republican within the New York legislature, instructed me. Consultant Marc Molinaro, a member of New York’s Home delegation, described Stefanik as “a chilled power” inside a Home Republican convention usually marred by infighting. After I famous that this characterization appeared to be at odds together with her combative fashion in public, Molinaro defined that Stefanik’s “outward persona” helps her preserve the convention from getting out of hand. “Everyone knows Elise. She’s sturdy. She’s robust,” he mentioned. “She didn’t must be that individual, as a result of we all know she will be that individual.”
Nonetheless, Kinzinger mentioned, in contrast to some Republicans in Congress, Stefanik doesn’t converse in a different way about Trump in non-public than she does in public. “I received that wink and nod from lots of people, not from her,” he mentioned. “She’s good sufficient to know that if she says one thing in non-public, it may get out.”
Stefanik can be good sufficient, Kinzinger instructed me, to know that Trump’s claims concerning the 2020 election, which she now recites, should not true. “She is aware of the drill,” he mentioned. “She would say precisely what I’d say if she had the liberty to do it, however she’s all in.”
To interview Stefanik is to strike a kind of deal: entry in trade for browbeating. She answered my questions at the same time as she rebuked me for asking about such trifling issues as election denialism and January 6. “On a regular basis People are sick and bored with the biased media, together with you, Russell, and the sorts of questions you’re asking,” Stefanik instructed me. I began to ask her about her current look on Meet the Press, the place she had casually referred to the January 6 defendants as “hostages”—an unsubtle echo of Trump’s language. The remark prompted a predictable spherical of shocked-but-not-surprised reactions from Democrats and anti-Trump Republicans. A New York Democrat, Consultant Dan Goldman, launched a decision to censure Stefanik over the comment.
Though Stefanik made a present of protesting my line of inquiry, she beat me to the query. I had barely uttered “Meet the Press … ” earlier than she began talking over me: “I do know—you’re so predictable—what you’re going to ask. You’re going to ask concerning the January 6 hostages.” Bingo. With out lacking a beat, Stefanik proceeded to learn aloud snippets from New York Instances and NPR stories about poor circumstances and alleged mistreatment of inmates charged with January 6 crimes. “The American persons are good. They see by means of this,” she mentioned. “They know that there’s a double normal of justice on this nation.”
Stefanik was attempting to argue that these information stories justified her use of a time period normally reserved for victims of terrorism. The specifics of the stories weren’t actually the purpose. Greater than something, she appeared to need to display that, like Trump, she wouldn’t again down or apologize. She sounded nearly cheerful, like a cheerful warrior for Trump—his pugnacious defender who would interact with the biased mainstream media with out giving in to them, with out conceding a single premise or hemming and hawing by means of an interview.
Stefanik was using excessive in MAGA world once we spoke. Her Meet the Press look was “a grasp class,” Bannon instructed me. Along with the “hostages” line, she refused to decide to certifying the 2024 election, producing outrage that solely added to the efficiency. “That is what we’re considering. That is us. That is who we’re,” Susan McNeil, a GOP county chair in Stefanik’s district, instructed me, referring to Stefanik’s feedback about certification. “Do I belief this election proper now? No.”
“For her to face sturdy and make these statements? Good. You’re not being bullied,” McNeil continued. “You’re not gonna get pressured to collapse to saying one thing that you simply’re not able to dignify with a solution but.”
Stefanik has no real interest in showing humble or self-deprecating. After I introduced up the Meet the Press interview, she used the identical phrase that Bannon needed to describe her efficiency. “It was a grasp class in pushing again” in opposition to the media, she instructed me, “and it has been extensively hailed.”
Cooperating with this story, like showing on the D.C. institution’s favourite speak present, appeared to be a part of Stefanik’s unofficial, unacknowledged audition for VP. It was a low-risk wager. A optimistic portrayal may impress the media-conscious Trump. If, then again, she didn’t like how the piece turned out, she may maintain it as much as Trump supporters as affirmation that the press has it out for them. Stefanik’s staff lined up almost a dozen native and nationwide validators to talk with me, together with Bannon, Scalise, and Consultant James Comer, who heads the committee main the Biden-impeachment inquiry.
Trump clearly prizes loyalty above absolutely anything else. Mike Pence displayed that high quality in spades, till out of the blue, on the most climactic second of Trump’s presidency, he didn’t. To check whether or not Stefanik’s allegiance had a restrict, I requested whether or not a Trump conviction for any of the crimes with which he’s been charged would have an effect on her assist in any method. “No,” she replied with out hesitation. “It’s a witch hunt by the Division of Justice. I consider Joe Biden is essentially the most corrupt president not simply in trendy historical past, however within the historical past of our nation.”
Stefanik was extra circumspect once I requested her what she would have achieved in a different way from Pence had she been accountable, as vice chairman, for presiding over the certification of Electoral Faculty ballots on January 6. Trump had pressured Pence to throw out ballots from states the place he was contesting the vote. Pence had refused. Given Stefanik’s obvious curiosity in Pence’s outdated job, it appeared related.
At first, she dodged the query by claiming that the election was rigged and referring to a speech she delivered on the Home flooring within the early hours of January 7, when she voted in opposition to certifying Biden’s victory in Pennsylvania. However that speech was worded way more fastidiously than the outright claims of fraud that Stefanik makes at the moment. Again then, she couched her objections as representing the views of her “involved” constituents. She didn’t say the election was stolen, nor did she say what motion Pence ought to have taken.
After I pressed her on Pence’s choice to not intervene and what she would have achieved, Stefanik replied merely, “I disagreed, and I consider it was an unconstitutional election.” She would go no additional than that.
At some level over the following a number of months, Stefanik’s twin roles as Trump booster and protector of the vanishing Home majority may come into battle. She has made clear that she needs Republicans to unify round Trump, and sooner relatively than later. Management of the Home, nevertheless, may nicely be decided in her deep-blue state, the place the nation’s most susceptible Republicans signify districts that Trump misplaced in 2020. Embracing Trump this fall may price a few of them their seats.
Now the longest-serving Republican within the New York delegation, Stefanik serves as a mentor for a number of of the state’s newer arrivals to the Home. She has helped get them seats on desired committees, and, through the speaker battle in October, she organized for the assorted candidates to take a seat for interviews with the delegation. However Stefanik has additionally labored to maintain them in line.
“She’s not afraid to be blunt,” Garbarino mentioned, recalling occasions when Stefanik chastised him for a public assertion she didn’t like. Her message? “We don’t should do the whole lot publicly,” Garbarino mentioned. “Typically it’s higher in case you say these things behind the scenes to any individual as a substitute of smacking them within the face publicly about it.”
Stefanik has taken the lead in combating Democratic makes an attempt to gerrymander New York of their favor, a part of an effort to reclaim the Home majority. (A current state-court ruling didn’t assist her trigger.) To that finish, she is working to make sure that not one of the state’s GOP Home members tries to avoid wasting their very own seat on the social gathering’s expense or says something in public that might undermine a possible Republican authorized problem. “She’s cracking the whip,” one Republican strategist within the state instructed me, talking on the situation of anonymity.
Stefanik’s hardest job, although, is likely to be getting her colleagues to assist Trump. Two swing-district Republicans in New York, Representatives Nick LaLota and Brandon Williams, have endorsed Trump as he simply captured the primary two major states. However others within the delegation have but to heed Stefanik’s name. In interviews, a couple of of them appeared hesitant even to utter his identify. “I’ve averted presidential politics, and Elise has at all times revered that,” Molinaro instructed me. As for Trump, he would say solely, “I intend to assist the presidential nominee.”
Garbarino used nearly precisely the identical phrases once I requested concerning the presidential race. Two different New York Republicans in districts that Biden gained, Representatives Mike Lawler and Anthony D’Esposito, declined interview requests. After I requested Stefanik if they might again Trump, she provided a assure: “They’re going to assist President Trump, who would be the nominee, as Republicans will throughout the nation.”
Privately, Stefanik has delivered an extra message to susceptible Republicans in New York, in response to a number of individuals I spoke with. “Stefanik has been very clear to not assault President Trump,” the GOP strategist mentioned. “Everybody is aware of that in New York.” As Stefanik sees it, criticizing Trump would damage even swing-district Republicans, as a result of the MAGA base is now a large constituency in districts that Biden carried. Nonetheless, different Home leaders haven’t exerted almost as a lot public strain on rank-and-file Republicans. “All of us every individually take completely different approaches to rising our majority,” Scalise instructed me. “I don’t inform anyone tips on how to handle their politics again dwelling.”
As Stefanik’s profile has grown, and as her rhetoric has grow to be even Trumpier, Democrats have sought to show her right into a political legal responsibility for swing-district Republicans, simply as they’ve the previous president. After Stefanik’s “hostages” remark, Home Minority Chief Hakeem Jeffries, who additionally hails from New York, mentioned that Stefanik “ought to be ashamed of herself.”
However then he pivoted to a political angle. “The true query,” Jeffries instructed reporters, “is why haven’t Home Republicans in New York, like Mike Lawler or others, denounced Elise Stefanik, and why do they proceed to depend on her fundraising assist with a purpose to attempt to idiot the voters in New York and faux like they consider moderately?” Not one of the New York Republicans took the bait, selecting to stay silent relatively than cross Stefanik. (“I didn’t see the clip,” Garbarino instructed me, in a single attribute dodge.)
Stefanik clearly welcomes these assaults. Within the MAGA world she now inhabits, enraging Democrats is the coin of the realm. Taking their fireplace solely pushes her nearer to the place she actually needs to be: at Trump’s facet.
